Last week I asked if the church is doing a good job of helping the poor and spreading the gospel.
In my own experience, many churches are at least trying to help the needy and unchurched in their own cities. (Their effectiveness at this is a subject for another day.) But what about the poor and unreached in more remote areas?
It is easier—and perhaps more appropriate—to send money in this case. (I’ll talk more about why I believe that’s true next month.)
As believers, we give to our local churches. A certain percentage of the offering is then designated for “benevolence” or “missions.” (I’ve seen “missions” mean anything from packaging dried soup mix, to helping the Hispanic church down the street, to “adopting” an unreached people group.) We trust the church leaders to spend our money wisely and responsibly.